On Tuesday, Twitter shareholders accepted a $44 billion buyout by Elon Musk and handled the deal’s outcome to the court battle wherein the billionaire has tried to scrap the purchase.

As per the report, Twitter’s lawyers, in a letter, said that the billionaire’s effort to walk away is “invalid and wrongful” and “Twitter has penetrated none of its representations or obligations”. Musk said that Twitter should have notified him before spending $7.75 million in an agreement of separation with Peiter Zatko. Earlier, Musk raised concerns about the number of bot accounts on the platform and the company’s hiring-and-firing decisions. It has been disputed that buyout agreement violations should enable him to withdraw his offer.

In April, Musk planned that he wanted to be the owner of Twitter, but due to the blowout between Twitter’s stock and the $54.20 deal price has enlarged, gesticulating scepticism will go through the transaction. Temporarily, the social network executed a hiring interruption while it resisted selling ads, and a broader market recession crushed the shares. The San Francisco-based company has been deprived of Musk’s claims over spam bots. The deal comprised a provision that if, under any circumstances, it fell apart and the party denying the agreement would have to pay a termination fee of $1 billion.

“Though this accusation is tougher than Musk’s earlier hiring-and-firing claims, only ‘material’ openings let Musk walk away,” Matthew Schettenhelm, a Bloomberg Intelligence litigation analyst, wrote in a note. “And we doubt a $7.75 million compensation payment succeeds, even if Twitter can’t show that it tracks the past practices.”